The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plain *

We’re innocent, the Devil made us do it! That’s the Spanish government’s way of admitting it has been poisoning its own employers (taxpayers, that is) by spraying them with toxic chemicals.

The only difference: the United Nations Organisation (UNO) plays the role of Devil Incarnate in this case. Meaning: humans are set to murder other humans using the most advanced technology that even Adolf Hitler’s Nazis would be envious of.

As reported by Lance D. Johnson of Natural News, using the so-called Covid pandemic as an excuse, the UNO told governments that releasing deadly chemicals on unsuspecting citizenry was perfectly acceptable.

The expression itself proves once again that the UNO has been trying to usurp the role of a single worldwide ruler: it “authorised” individual national governments to use the spraying of chemicals. Not only that, the entire operation dates back long before anybody started mentioning pandemics in general and a non-existing Covid virus in particular: a European Parliament member raised the question first in 2007, and this was not the first time people questioned the practice.

What’s happened since? A lot: the spraying has continued and it’s going on even today. When then-Iraq supreme leader Saddam Hussein had his Kurdish population sprayed from air, using a weapon of mass destruction, a killing chemical substance, detractors of those condemning it claimed there were no weapons of mass destruction in Hussein’s arsenal, while others, quite properly, condemned it as a war crime.

Crimes against humanity

Spraying chemicals, deadly or not, on unsuspecting populations violates the Nuremberg Code on multiple counts. Of course, we’re getting used to it by now: this human rights and medical ethics treaty seems to have become a useless piece of paper. All those who are supposed to uphold it keep ignoring it instead. Who will summon an international tribunal to judge them when most governments around the world are guilty of breaking it?

Here’s the official explanation: “state of emergency for the management of the health crisis situation caused by Covid-19.”

And here’s the real issue: governments and other official institutions have been perpetrating this lie so often they must be believing it themselves by now.

For those not conversant with the Spanish language, here’s what the Royal Decree 463/2020, of March 14, 2020 says: it enables the Minister of Health to take “a series of measures aimed at protecting the welfare, health and safety of citizens and the containment of the progression of the disease and strengthen the public health system.”

It also lets the Minister “dictate the orders, resolutions, provisions and interpretive instructions that, within their scope of action as a delegated authority, are necessary to guarantee the provision of all services, ordinary or extraordinary, in order to protect of people, goods and places, through the adoption of any of the measures provided for in article eleven of Organic Law 4/1981, of June 1, of the states of alarm, exception and site.”

That another order, named SND/351/2020, gave the Spanish Ministry of Health the supreme and unlimited power to activate the Spanish Armed Forces and Military Emergency Units to deploy biocide chemicals over the citizens can be taken as read.

Nothing new for the Spanish: their country has had a history of using what they call “aerial media” to modify the weather.

Many used to cry “conspiracy theory” when the issue had been raised years ago. We have only two issues here. By definition, a hypothesis differs from and a theory. The former must put all the known facts in their most logical sequence and none of the facts can contradict any other facts in the chain. The latter goes a step further: all those facts must be confirmed, confirming the whole as a result.

The other issue, true especially now: what some describe as conspiracy theories become facts within a period of anywhere between six weeks and six months.

In the case of Spain, she used to be used as a testing ground for chemtrails that include lead dioxide, silver iodide and diatomite. Here’s the official explanation (or, better still, a put-off): in 2015, the idea was to engineer the climate by increasing local temperatures and pushing moisture out of the sky to create conditions conducive for tourism.

Unbelievable? Read Europarliament member (MEP) Ramon Tremosa Balcells’s testimony before the European Parliament, May 19, 2015: workers from the State Meteorological Agency reported planes spreading the toxic chemicals across Spain.

All hands on deck

The universally acclaimed environmentalist, virologist, epidemiologist and Malthusian guru Bill Gates has been into a save-the-planet project that makes any mad scientist in the James Bond or Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde infamies pale in comparison: how about dimming the sun and thus change the climate?

You can’t turn the switch off on the sun: too hot when you get too close. But using chemicals sprayed from planes into the air (atmosphere, troposphere, stratosphere), any or all of them, can do the job.

Who cares that most scientists who know a thing or two about these matters have called the idea not only useless, but also dangerous and perfectly unethical?

Here’s the short list of their concerns:

  • such geo-engineering programs negatively impact weather patterns;
  • they are a major threat to agriculture;
  • they endanger all ecosystems;
  • they have a negative impact on the quality of air we breathe;
  • as a result, the endanger human health;
  • and, last but not least, they make food and water security a mockery of all mockeries.

So far as Bill Gates and his supporters go, who cares about the minor fact that such projects violate basic human rights? In this context, the concerned scientists ask, just who owns the skies? Who will be held accountable for experimenting on human populations without their consent?

An international group of scientists are warning all levels of regulators around the world about the consequences of global, sun dimming experiments. Alas, they are not as rich as Bill Gates. People like him enjoy showing their power and displaying their God-like complexes.

The Swedish Space Agency in 2021 has stopped the Bill Gates experiment in 2021.

Judging by the scientific please to stop this nonsense, many of the experts in the field have started questioning Bill Gates’s sanity. They sum up their observations by saying that he thinks he is in control over the Earth’s atmosphere, the temperature, the solar energy cycles, agriculture, crop genetics, and what genes should be turned on or off in people’s bodies, among other things.

A couple of questions: is Bill Gates alone or is he acting in co-operation with others, equally megalomaniac criminals (that would make them co-conspirators)? And will humanity ever wake up and do the only reasonable thing by putting them to work with spades and shovels, without any perspective that they would be let loose on humanity ever again?

* The headline is stolen from the 1964 musical, My Fair Lady (book and lyrics by Alan Jay Lerner, music by Frederick Loewe, all of that based on G.B. Shaw’s 1913 play, Pygmalion, whose idea Shaw stole from ancient Greek mythology)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: