This day is coming and the sooner it lands upon us, the better for an overwhelming majority of humans. Those in power today, again, in their overwhelming majority, can start shaking in their boots. The cynically open conspiracy to change our civilization through what some call Great Reset, while describing it as the fourth industrial revolution, will end facing humanity’s wrath before a World Tribunal for Crimes Against Humanity.
It will, to a huge degree, resemble the Tribunal Against War Crimes that concluded the Second World War.
Most of the accused in Nurnberg tried to claim innocence by saying they were only following orders, or they obeyed the existing laws. Yes, some of them would admit, those laws were brutal, but still, they were the laws of their land.
The international justices at Nurnberg referred to a concept known as Natural law.
This is a millennia-old system (with a Latin name: lex naturalis). It teaches that there exists a system of right or justice held to be common to all humans and derived from nature rather than from the rules of society, or positive law.
The Greek philosopher, Aristotle, said it best, and his view remains valid to this day. What is “just by nature” is not always the same as what is “just by law.” There exists a natural justice valid everywhere with the same force and “not existing by people’s thinking this or that,” and that appeal could be made to it from positive law.
What does it mean?
Not only politicians and government officials who are making orders and laws that fail the test of humanitarianism, but also the physicians who propagate their orders and laws, and teachers who smother their pupils by forcing them to wear face masks, all those so-called peace officials and security people who blindly obey orders and bully people into submission, all of them will be found guilty.
Not by association. Purely guilty.
Who’s on top?
Four names come to mind first: Bill and Melinda Gates, Klaus Martin Schwab and George Soros, in alphabetical order.
And no, this is not just another conspiracy theory.
After all, those who make dismissive claims of such theories should perhaps check their dictionaries first: we have a view, then comes an opinion, then a hypothesis, and then, only then, a theory.
We see something, we think something about it, we put together all known facts, lining them to make a perfect story, without omitting a single one of them, and without a single fact contradicting any other facts, thus creating a hypothesis.
But, in order to develop a hypothesis into a theory, we must provide proof to each and every fact, and to the whole, too.
All of the four individuals mentioned above have been blatantly and insolently open about their plans. Just check out the Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and Open Society’s proceedings.
So, these facts are out there, in the open.
With all those lockdowns and banned gatherings and whatnot, our politicians have destroyed national economies worldwide almost beyond damages caused by the Great Depression of 1929, and the two world wars, combined.
They used artificial panic caused by a virus almost to perfection. And our intrepid mainstream media, led by frightfully illiterate and incompetent would-be journalists, carried the flag for them.
Yet, it would have been enough to just check the numbers sundry governments used to flood us with.
Herewith, a simple comparison, provided by Armstrong Economics: there was a flu pandemic in 2009. According to U.S. Center for Disease Control’s (CDC) own numbers published then, “[f]rom April 12, 2009 to April 10, 2010, CDC estimated there were 60.8 million cases (range: 43.3-89.3 million), 274,304 hospitalizations (range: 195,086-402,719), and 12,469 deaths (range: 8868-18,306) in the United States due to the (H1N1)pdm09 virus.”
By 2020’s end, CDC estimates that 20 million people have caught this new version, a.k.a. Covid-19.
More comparisons: the numbers CDC estimated in 2009 were three times higher than the real number of infections. And yet, strangely, in 2009, nobody called for any lockdowns. Nobody created a wild rush to obtain a vaccine that would be forced upon the general population (while creating lists of those who resisted).
The World Health Organization (WHO) commissioned a review of Ivermectin trials. That would be a medication that claims a 83-per-cent reduction in Covid mortality.
Ivermectin is an anti-parasite medication. It is used to treat infections in the body that are caused by certain parasites. Many have long ago called Ivermectin the gold bullet that can work as reliable treatment for coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which is the virus that causes COVID-19.
The wide-ranging study by Dr. Andrew Hill of the Department of Pharmacology at the University of Liverpool explains that its result is based on in-hospital trials. That means that it doesn’t even take into account early ambulatory and prophylactic treatment. Dr. Hill speaks of Ivermectin as a potentially “transformational treatment.”
According to published reports, the WHO now wants to wait for three more trials, due to be published sometime in January, before issuing an official recommendation.
Interestingly, neither Pfizer nor Moderna, nor any other vaccine-touting huge pharmaceutical company is on the list of major manufacturers of Ivermectin. The best-known list of Ivermectin producers includes SAMEX OVERSEAS (India), LAND (Hong Kong), Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical (China), MERCK (U.S.A.), and Hero Pharmaceutical (Iran).
Why would WHO change its views all of a sudden, concentrating on treatment rather than vaccines? After all, Ivermectin is so much cheaper than all those vaccines, meaning much less in profits. You can get it for less than $20, the usual cost is less than $50. There are places where you can get it over the counter, even.
Not only that: you can get generic versions: Soolantra or Stromectol, for example.
Yes, these medications have side effects. Is there a medication without any? And, besides, the content of these anti-parasite medications is well-known, definitely not as mysterious as the contents of the vaccines being pushed upon us.
All of the facts at hand show in one direction, and one direction only: a tribunal that would try those guilty of today’s situation hangs like the sword of Damocles over the heads of those guilty, WHO among them.
WHO’s sudden, almost indecent, change of view indicates that they have become aware of an alliance known as the “Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee” (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss, or ACU, in German). The group was formally created by four attorneys on July 10, 2020. It now includes well over 500 doctors and experts in multiple disciplines. They concluded that the draconian government measures against freedom are all out of proportion to the dangers posed by the Communist Chinese virus.
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, one of the founders of the ACU, has announced that the group has been in final stages of preparing an international class-action lawsuit, specifically targeting those responsible for imposing the deadly “lockdown” policies on much of humanity.
Dr. Fuellmich has been practicing law as a consumer-protection trial lawyer in both Germany and California for over a quarter of a century.
While, personally, I object to capital punishment, I suggest that those guilty get nothing less than life behind bars, without parole.
For those with interest in more details, thanks to Swiss Policy Research: